It began as “a very loving and joking one-up-manship,” says Joshua Drew, an ecologist at Columbia University. The question was simple: Who gets to work in more beautiful places? The challenge: Prove it.
Thus, #fieldworkfaceoff was on.
In the summer, when the academic calendar releases them from the classroom, scientists head to the field. This is their chance to observe firsthand the bit of the world that they’re trying to understand. Fieldwork isn’t glamorous: scientists often find themselves alternating between sprints of manic work and stretches of necessary boredom, while on a budget and in less than comfortable quarters.
But then there are moments like these:
The swing between the highs and lows of fieldwork can be breathtaking. “You can go from horribly wrong—I’ve wasted $10,000 worth of money—to waking up in the morning and feeling like the luckiest person in the world to be working in a place like this,” says Drew. Last year on social media, scientists went through a collective airing of their most embarrassing fieldwork experiences, under the label #fieldworkfail. It was so popular there will soon be an illustrated book featuring some of the best.
Anne Hilborn, an ecologist who studies the interaction between predator and prey, was one of originators of #fieldworkfail and still has a prime example, featuring cheetah poop, pinned to the top of her Twitter timeline. “There’s something attractive about ridiculous stories of people doing dangerous things,” she says.
With #fieldworkfail, decades of experiences and stories came pouring out, at once. The joys of #fieldworkfaceoff are different. This new Twitter game, of cheeky “my field site is better than yours” posts, began Drew says, because he “wanted to highlight that it’s not all cheetah butts.”
There’s also that element of fun, adventure, and straight up beauty:
“It’s a nice way to show daily life, and the wins and the losses at the same time,” Hilborn says. For example:
In this past, these moments might have passed by, or if they were documented, been piled with the dump of data that scientists brought with them back to “real life.” Increasingly, though, even remote field sites have wireless hotspots, and it’s as easy and tempting to share the moments of great science life as it is for anyone on vacation. Plus, as much as scientists might like brag a little about their own field sites, they also like getting a glimpse of the work others are doing.
Also—perhaps most importantly—“it helps with the boredom,” says Hilborn.